Time is Limited - Act Now

directcasejustice

Sexual abuse victims from active and closed juvenile hall detention facilties in California may seek justice and compensation

Sexual abuse victims from active and closed juvenile hall detention facilties in California may seek justice and compensation

Eligible victims must have suffered abuse while at one of the following active and closed California-based juvenile hall detention facilities while under the age of 18. 

Reported active and closed camps include:

  • Los Padrinos Juvenile Hall, Downey
  • Central Juvenile Hall, 1605 Eastlake Ave, Los Angeles
  • Barry J. Nidorf Juvenile Hall, 16350 Filbert St, Sylmar

Limited Time to File Claim

Changes in California Law Go Into Affect At The End of 2022. To Currently Qualify for Possible Compensation You Must Be Born AFTER to May 1, 1983

FREE CONFIDENTIAL CASE REVIEW

*Consent: By clicking the "SUBMIT" button, I consent to receive recurring auto dialed and/or text messages from Direct Case Justice or our partners in order to discuss my legal options and at the telephone number I provided. I also consent to the Direct Case Justice Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. I understand that I may receive a call even if my telephone number is listed on a Do Not Call list and that my consent is not a requirement of purchase. I understand that my telephone company may impose charges on me for these contacts and that I can revoke this consent at any time. For SMS campaigns: Text STOP to cancel and HELP for help. Msg & data rates may apply. Recurring msgs up to 27 msgs per month.

Details of alleged sexual abuse at active and closed California-based juvenile hall detention facilties

detention_center4

According to a report by the Los Angeles Times, a large number of California’s active and closed juvenile camps are accused of sexual and physical abuse of the minors by guards in their facilities.

In fact, more than 10 California juvenile probation guards have been convicted of crimes for inappropriate conduct involving current or former child probationers–including several cases of molesting or beating children in their care.

Court documents filed disclose that supervisors at these active and closed juvenile camps ignored unchecked assault, rape, and sexual harassment of child inmates by probation officers in what should have been safe environments.

"Vulnerable children often enter the system because of abuse they have suffered at home or on the streets," described one of the cases prosecuting attorneys.

“The probation system should offer these youthful offenders restorative justice instead of perpetuating their cycle of abuse. The criminal conduct of those who used their positions of authority to sexually assault these children must be exposed. These despicable people and those who enabled them must be held accountable."

News stories–plus state and county reports–outline over 20 years of criminal acts that include:

  • Sexual contact between officers and minor inmates;
  • Officers accused of criminal acts such as theft;
  • Probation officers encouraging fights among juveniles;
  • A variety of other offenses committed while on duty. 

In addition to the inordinate number of accusations of sexual and physical assaults leveled by victims against their should-be protectors, there are also records of criminal charges in connection with guards’ improper use of pepper spray on child inmates.

Victims and their families are urged to come forward for a free, private case evaluation from a qualified attorney as soon as possible–eligible victims only have until December 31, 2022, to file a valid claim!

Specific cases of sexual abuse in active and closed California-based juvenile hall detention facilties

shutterstock_1196187574

As one of the nation’s largest juvenile justice systems, Los Angeles County staffs a population of probation officers responsible for monitoring about 3,000 youths in 21 halls and camps spread out across the state.

Operating with a yearly budget of approximately $700 million, the department has recently been the focus of intensive federal investigations for failing in its duty to prevent, report, and document child abuse at its facilities.

The Los Angeles Times released information on the following specific instances of cases that were gathered through a collection of law enforcement records, court documents, and department sources.

Notable examples of sexual and physical abuse allegations in active and closed California-based juvenile hall detention facilities include:

  • A female probation officer used her power to persuade five teens under her care to beat another teenager – she mistakenly believed the teen had stolen her mobile phone–she was later sentenced to a year in jail.

The injured child was not allowed to see a doctor until the next day, when another probation officer noticed his injuries–the officer later found her cellphone in the parking lot.

  • A male probation officer was captured on closed circuit television assaulting a youth offender in a juvenile hall recreation room – the probation officer was later convicted of battery and sentenced to 24 months’ probation.

According to the disciplined officer’s attorney, there were a variety of “extenuating circumstances” that led to the beating–he noted that his client was not properly trained to supervise violent offenders before being hired. 

  • A female probation officer was found to have had sexual encounters with multiple youth offenders in several locations of the detention hall where she worked – after later pleading guilty to five counts of felony sexual abuse, the guard served four years in prison.

The offending officer explained, “I had a consensual relationship with a young man who was 17 and I stupidly thought I was in love with…everything else I did was completely inappropriate, unethical and extremely unprofessional.” 

The team at Direct Case Justice believes that every victim of sexual abuse at active and closed California-based juvenile hall detention facilities should receive justice and compensation in a court of law – keep in mind that eligible victims only have until the end of 2022 to file a valid claim!

Our network of attorneys have a track record of success.

IS THERE A CASE?

Answer a brief, private online questionnaire that asks for key details of the experience

EXPERIENCED LAWYERS

Have the case evaluated by a legal team free of charge without any obligation to file

GET STARTED NOW

Contact us right away to set up a free and confidential case review. 

Please seek the advice of a medical professional before making health care decisions. This advertisement is not associated any government agency.

www.directcasejustice.com is the property of Shield Legal LLC. 7180 S Pollock Drive, 2nd Floor, Las Vegas, NV 89119

This website is not part of the Facebook website or Facebook, Inc. Additionally, this site is NOT endorsed by Facebook in any way. FACEBOOK is a trademark of FACEBOOK, INC.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. This Website is not intended to provide medical advice. Consult your doctor or physician before starting or stopping any medication.
Discontinuing a prescribed medication without your doctor’s advice can result in injury or death. are not an indication of future results. Every case is evaluated on its own facts and circumstances. Valuation depends on facts, injuries, jurisdiction, venue, witnesses, parties, and testimony, among other factors. No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. Direct Case Justice does not itself provide legal services. Cases will be referred to third party attorneys and law firms. Do not rely on this advertisement in making any medical decision. Please call your physician before making any medical decision, including altering your use of any drug. Court costs and case expenses may be the responsibility of the client. Not available in all states. This advertisement is not intended as a testimonial, endorsement or dramatization, and does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter, either expressed or implied. Anyone considering a lawyer should independently investigate the lawyers' credentials and ability, and not rely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. Only persons age 18 or older have permission to access our Service. Our Service does not address anyone under the age of 13("Children").

Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | CCPA Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell My Info

©2024 Direct Case Justice. All Rights Reserved